Use Case

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) & Financial Crime Investigation

Trace money flows and hidden ownership structures with Graphlytic

Transaction monitoring systems generate large volumes of alerts, and only a small fraction turn out to be genuine. AML analysts and compliance officers still have to manually trace how funds move through layers of shell companies, nominee directors and offshore structures before a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) or Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) can be filed. That work is slow by nature: ownership is often deliberately obscured across jurisdictions, bank secrecy regimes and corporate registries that don't talk to each other, and a single case can easily involve hundreds of linked entities.

Regulatory pressure makes the problem worse. Filing deadlines are fixed, fines for inadequate monitoring keep growing, and investigators are expected to document a clear, defensible chain of evidence - not just a conclusion. Spreadsheets and case notes don't scale once a case grows past a handful of entities, and patterns such as structuring, layering or smurfing are very hard to spot in rows of transactions, even though they stand out immediately once the same data is drawn as a graph.

Graphlytic turns transaction and ownership data into a connected graph of accounts, companies, individuals and transfers. Analysts can follow the flow of funds across an unlimited number of hops, and the application surfaces entities that share an address, phone number, IBAN or director - links that are easy to miss in tabular data but immediately visible once drawn as a graph. Beneficial ownership chains that span several layers of holding companies become a short walk through the graph instead of a manual cross-referencing exercise across multiple registries.

Graphlytic can be deployed on-premises, which matters for financial institutions working with data that cannot leave their own infrastructure. For a practical illustration of the same approach applied to real-world leaked financial data, see our Panama Papers demo, built on the ICIJ Offshore Leaks dataset of over 200,000 offshore entities, their officers and intermediaries.

Anti-Money Laundering investigation graph visualization based on the Panama Papers dataset
Try our free online demo Panama Papers to see Graphlytic in action →
Offshore Leaks data · no sign-up required

Summary

Pain points / Challenges
  • High volume of false-positive alerts from transaction monitoring systems
  • Beneficial ownership hidden behind layers of shell companies and nominees
  • Structures spanning multiple jurisdictions and disconnected data sources
  • Manual link-building in spreadsheets slows down SAR/STR filing
  • Structuring, layering and smurfing patterns are hard to spot in tabular data
  • Growing regulatory scrutiny and fines for inadequate monitoring
Solution
  • Import transaction, KYC and registry data from core banking or case-management systems
  • Visualize fund flows and ownership chains across unlimited hops
  • Cluster entities that share an address, phone number, director or IBAN
  • On-premises deployment for sensitive financial data
  • Annotate findings and export them directly into the case file
Benefits
  • Faster case resolution and shorter investigation times
  • Less manual follow-up effort spent on false positives
  • A clear, documented evidence trail for regulators and law enforcement
  • Faster onboarding of new AML analysts